AI Research Papers

AllLarge Language Models (LLMs)Computer Vision & Image GenerationAudio & Speech SynthesisPrompt Engineering & InferenceAI Agents & ReasoningModel Optimization & QuantizationOther
Prompt Engineering & Inference7/6/2026

Where to cut, how deep: BPE and Unigram-LM on chemistry SMILES

Every chemical language model reading SMILES begins with a tokenizer, yet the field has inherited byte-pair encoding (BPE) from natural language with little scrutiny. In natural language, BPE's principal alternative, Unigram-LM, is known to build structurally different vocabularies. Whether that contrast survives in chemistry was open. We report a controlled comparison of BPE and Unigram-LM over a fixed 165-token chemistry base, at the small vocabulary sizes where token embeddings are learnable, across three corpus typologies (diverse, drug-like, natural-products) and both pre-tokenization boundary policies. The two do not converge. In all 22 matched conditions they build near-disjoint subword vocabularies: cross-algorithm Jaccard overlap on the learned pieces never exceeds 0.161, and at most 0.05 once weighted toward the high-frequency pieces a model updates most. Unigram-LM also segments held-out molecules into 29-41% more tokens; the arms largely agree on where to cut but not how deeply, so BPE's segmentation is a strict coarsening of Unigram-LM's on 80-99% of molecules. The separation holds across corpus, boundary, and vocabulary size, persisting even at eight times that scale. The subword algorithm is therefore a modeling decision, not a free default. The study trains no language models.

Read Details →
AI Agents & Reasoning7/6/2026

Memory in the Loop: In-Process Retrieval as ExtendedWorking Memory for Language Agents

Language agents run a loop - observe, reason, act - but the memory they reason over sits outside it: a store queried at most once per turn. We study the regime where memory moves inside the loop, read and written on every step. The obstacle has always been latency: networked stores answer in tens to hundreds of milliseconds, and in-loop retrieval can inflate end-to-end latency by up to 83x when retrieval is expensive. Prior work manages that cost rather than questioning it: serving-layer scheduling hides it, "memory-first" designs ration retrieval to once per turn. We argue latency is a property of where the store lives, not the in-loop pattern: an in-process store answers in ~100us, three orders of magnitude below the network regime, and at that speed the per-step tax collapses. By the extended-mind thesis's parity principle, a store fast enough to be constantly and directly available becomes extended working memory, not a tool the agent merely consults. The premise is causal: holding a fixed per-turn memory-latency budget and varying only the store's answer speed, redundant actions rise monotonically with latency - 0.0 of 12 at in-process speed, 7.2 of 12 at a 110ms cloud round trip (gpt-5-nano, gpt-5-mini; exact permutation p=0.0079). We demonstrate the regime end-to-end: across four GPT-5-class models under a bounded window, recall improves from 0/5 to 3.6-4.8/5 with in-loop memory, store ops at p50 80-165us - though an instructed restate-every-reply baseline also solves it perfectly, at a token cost that grows with the working set. The store never lost a fact in any run (244 of 244 writes kept); every miss traces to the agent's read policy, not the store. Our measurements also relocate the bottleneck: the dominant per-step cost is embedding (~200-400ms over the network); pairing the in-process store with a small local embedder returns the complete operation to a measured ~40us.

Read Details →
AI Agents & Reasoning7/6/2026

UCSC NLP at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Boundary-Aware Span Extraction and RoBERTa Classification for Conspiracy Detection

We present our systems for SemEval-2026 Task 10 (PsyCoMark), addressing conspiracy marker extraction (Subtask 1) and document-level conspiracy detection (Subtask 2). For marker extraction, we formulate the task as multi-label span classification over enumerated candidate spans, using IoU >= 0.95 positive labeling, hard-negative sampling, and containment-based non-maximum suppression (NMS) with boundary-aware span representations. Document classification is modeled independently using a sequence classifier with label smoothing and a stratified train-validation split. Analysis shows that entity-like roles (Actor, Victim) are detected robustly, while abstract roles (Action, Effect, Evidence) remain sensitive to boundary criteria. On the official test set, our systems rank 7th in Subtask 1 (0.2251 macro F1) and 11th in Subtask 2 (0.7694 weighted F1).

Read Details →
Large Language Models (LLMs)7/6/2026

Depression Symptoms and Relational Patterns in 187k ChatGPT Histories

Large language models are increasingly used as private, always-available conversational systems, but little is known about how people with depressive symptoms use them. Building on CSCW work on disclosure and peer support, we examine ChatGPT as an emerging informal support infrastructure: private, persistent, responsive, and available outside ordinary hours. We analyze 187,093 ChatGPT conversations from 766 participants who completed the PHQ-8, comparing those below the moderate-symptom threshold (score of 10) with those at or above it. Higher-PHQ participants used ChatGPT more for mental-health, interpersonal, loneliness, self-focused, and support-seeking conversations, with pronounced late-night and recurring month-level patterns. Their language contained more first-person singular pronouns and absolutist terms. They more often engaged ChatGPT in high-disclosure contexts, but professional redirection was not higher. Language-based prediction was modest and insufficient for screening (AUROC 0.591). We argue these histories should not be treated as clinical screening data but as evidence LLMs are increasingly used as informal support infrastructure.

Read Details →
Prompt Engineering & Inference7/6/2026

FirstResearch: Auditable Question Formation for LLM Scientific Discovery Agents

LLM systems for scientific discovery increasingly assist with ideation, literature synthesis, experiment planning, and report generation, but the first research question they propose can remain difficult to audit: it may sound plausible without exposing the mechanism, falsifier, or assumption that a scientist should inspect. We introduce FirstResearch, a first-principles research-question formation framework for scientific LLM agents whose core artifact is a structured Research Question Certificate. The certificate records primitive definitions, assumptions, a mechanism model, a tension or contradiction, a falsifiable hypothesis, a minimal decisive test, and a failure update rule, making the proposed question inspectable before downstream execution. On ten LLM-agent research topics, FirstResearch outperforms controlled prompt-level baselines inspired by AI co-scientist, Agent Laboratory, and AI Scientist-v2 under a primary DeepSeek-blind-judge protocol. A Gemini-2.5-Flash independent-judge rescore of the same 40 baseline packages preserves the system-level ranking, with FirstResearch scoring 4.86/5 versus 4.38/5 for the strongest baseline and Pearson agreement of 0.865 on average score. A one-repeat ablation checkpoint further suggests that the certificate-centered core is the strongest component: certificate-only scoring reaches 4.90/5 under DeepSeek and 4.88/5 under Gemini, while removing certificates drops below 1/5 under both judges. These results are preliminary and use LLM judges rather than human domain experts, but they support a narrow scientific-discovery claim: explicit derivation constraints are a promising mechanism for making LLM-generated scientific questions more auditable. Code, prompts, saved outputs, and reproduction scripts are available at https://github.com/louiswang524/FirstResearch.

Read Details →
AI Agents & Reasoning7/6/2026

Beyond Accuracy: How Humans Evaluate Legally Correct but Socially Controversial Legal Advice from Machines

AI systems are increasingly used to provide legal advice, raising questions about whether laypeople accept guidance from algorithms--especially when that advice is legally correct but socially controversial. We report a preregistered survey experiment with 3,348 adults in mainland China examining how people evaluate identical legal advice when it is attributed either to an AI system or to a human lawyer, and when it is accompanied by reasoning or not. Contrary to expectations of algorithm aversion, attribution to an AI system has no net effect on perceived reasonableness. However, mediation analyses reveal opposing psychological pathways underlying this null result. AI-attributed advice is perceived as more objective, which increases perceived reasonableness, but also as less comprehensive and less attentive to special circumstances, which decreases perceived reasonableness. By contrast, providing legal reasoning substantially increases perceived reasonableness regardless of source, largely by enhancing perceptions of objectivity. Qualitative responses corroborate this tension between objectivity and contextual sensitivity in evaluations of legal advice. Together, these findings suggest that public responses to AI legal advisors are shaped not by rigid attitudes toward automation, but by the balancing of competing normative expectations. The results have implications for theories of algorithm aversion and the design of AI recommendation systems in normatively salient domains.

Read Details →
Large Language Models (LLMs)7/6/2026

RPAM: A Principled Metric for Evaluating Associations in Language Models with High Predictive Validity in Downstream Outputs

Language models (LMs) exhibit problematic biases, such as stereotypes. Effectively analyzing and mitigating such biases requires accurate and generalizable evaluation methods of the underlying associations. Some existing approaches focus on downstream metrics that analyze associations in generated text. Since generated text content can vary drastically across LMs, such metrics often require specialized evaluation datasets, which limits the generalization of such downstream metrics. In contrast, upstream metrics examine LMs at the fundamental level of embeddings or continuation probabilities, enabling principled association analyses across LMs. Yet, to date, no upstream metric for generative LMs has uncovered a strong relationship with real-world associations, including those measured in generated text. To address this gap, we introduce the Relative Probability Association Metric (RPAM), an association evaluation metric for generative LMs. For three LMs of different quality of language generation and purpose (Mistral-7B-Instruct, Mistral-7B, and GPT-2) and well-studied evaluation datasets (WEAT-WS, Bellezza, WS-353, and SST2), we find a strong relationship between upstream RPAM measurements and corresponding implicit and explicit associations observed in humans, as well as biases measured downstream with LM-specific tasks, outperforming prior record values where applicable.

Read Details →
Model Optimization & Quantization7/6/2026

Clustered Codebook Quantization for 2D Gaussian-based Image Compression

Gaussian-based image representations effectively model image content using compact parametric primitives while preserving high visual fidelity, yet storing a large number of floating-point parameters per primitive degrades rate-distortion efficiency at higher fidelity targets. To improve the rate-distortion performance in Gaussian representation, we present our Cluster-Guided Vector Quantization (CGVQ), a Gaussian primitive based image compression method. Our key idea is to partition Gaussian parameters further into homogeneous groups prior to quantization, enabling higher compression efficiency and accurate parameter reconstruction. In practice, our extensive experiments show that CGVQ decreases the bpp by 20% with respect to our baseline, while maintaining on-par visual quality

Read Details →
AI Agents & Reasoning7/6/2026

What Do AI Agents Actually Change? An Empirical Taxonomy of Mutation Patterns in Performance-Improving Pull Requests

AI coding agents are black boxes: we cannot inspect how they generate code, but we can inspect what they change. This distinction matters for search-based software engineering (SBSE), where techniques such as genetic improvement (in the performance-optimisation application we study) depend on mutation operators that reflect how code is actually transformed. Fewer than 1% of the 33,596 agent PRs in AIDev-pop target performance, making each case a rare window into otherwise opaque agent behaviour. We classify 1,254 performance-relevant diff hunks from 216 of these PRs, spanning five agent systems, against the 18-category syntactic mutation taxonomy of Even-Mendoza et al. (2025) using a dual-LLM intersection pipeline. Three categories dominate: name modification (37.0%), object creation (26.4%), and type change (22.7%), a profile markedly different from prior GI corpora where no change accounted for 84%. Each agent's deployed system commits to a distinctive mutation vocabulary, and each performance strategy activates a largely disjoint category subset. Agent identity and target strategy are therefore informative priors that narrow the effective SBSE operator space. Replication package: https://github.com/5uper6rain/ssbse-challenge-2026

Read Details →
AI Agents & Reasoning7/6/2026

Physics-Regularized Machine Learning for Proprioceptive Vehicle Localization Using Onboard Sensors

Accurate and robust localization is essential for autonomous mobility systems in real-world environments. While fusing Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data with satellite-based correction signals provides precise vehicle pose estimates, performance degrades substantially during outages. Recent studies indicate that Machine Learning (ML) can improve IMU-based proprioceptive localization, highlighting untapped potential for onboard sensors readily available in production vehicles. This paper introduces Physics-Regularized Machine Learning for Localization (PRML2), a hybrid framework that combines the complementary strengths of Kalman filtering and data-driven learning to estimate vehicle pose directly from onboard sensors. A key aspect of PRML2 is its physics-regularized learning, enabled by end-to-end training of an ML model through a differentiable Kalman filter. This improves consistency with vehicle motion models, thereby enhancing both localization accuracy and generalization across driving conditions. We evaluate the performance limits of ML-enhanced onboard odometry on a publicly available dataset and show that PRML2 achieves superior localization accuracy and demonstrates real-time capability. This work also introduces a novel dataset to support vehicle localization research under low-friction conditions. The proposed framework provides a robust and cost-effective solution for vehicle localization under degraded sensing conditions by integrating learning with physics-based priors.

Read Details →
Computer Vision & Image Generation7/6/2026

REVIVE: A Multi-Modal Framework for Vandalism Detection and Recovery in Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) face increasing threats from vandalism-induced occlusion attacks (VOAs) that compromise camera-based perception. While detection frameworks can identify vandalized images, restoring camera-stream utility after physical occlusion remains underexplored. This paper presents present the Recovery and Enhancement of Vandalized Images for Vision Excellence (REVIVE) framework, a vandalism recovery pipeline integrating: (1) binary VOA detection, (2) multi-class VOA pattern identification, (3) EfficientNet-based U-Net segmentation, and (4) type-aware recovery using Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (BLIP)-guided Stable Diffusion inpainting, direct pixel replacement, or adaptive median filtering. Stable Diffusion shows variable reconstruction performance (per-pattern SSIM 0.667-0.867, PSNR 15.4-26.7dB) across VOA patterns, while aligned direct pixel replacement achieves near-identical reconstruction under the aligned-reference condition. On 500 tracked clean/vandalized image pairs, unrecovered VOAs reduce YOLOv8l object-detection recall to 0.588, while direct pixel replacement restores recall to 0.967 and F1-score to 0.970 under that aligned-reference condition. LaMa, Telea, and Navier-Stokes baselines improve image similarity but provide more limited downstream detection recovery, and Stable Diffusion is treated as an asynchronous recovery branch subject to a quality gate rather than a blocking real-time perception step. We evaluate a reference-available quality gate that filters recovered candidates before downstream use: without it, type-aware routing degrades per-image recall to 0.304, whereas with it, recall returns to 0.608, at or above the unrecovered baseline, ensuring the forwarded stream is never worse than the unrecovered frame. REVIVE therefore, provides a structured recovery framework from VOAs in AVs.

Read Details →
Large Language Models (LLMs)7/6/2026

Do It Right! A Methodology for Successful NLP System Development

Natural language processing (NLP) is a common method for supplying data to clinical research and decision making by extracting information from electronic medical records. Numerous textbooks and tutorials describe specific algorithms and applications for text processing, yet algorithmic knowledge is only one ingredient of a successful NLP project. Drawing on the available literature, this paper presents a stepwise approach that applies the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) to projects that rely on data extraction through language processing.

Read Details →
PreviousNext